NCAA Tournament March Madness
#361 Alabama A&M
Bubble Watch | Bracketology
Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?
Projection: need to automatically qualify
Alabama A&M’s resume is far from appealing, as they’ve struggled against both stronger and similarly ranked opponents throughout the season. Losses to teams like Georgia and Lipscomb highlight significant defensive vulnerabilities, while their occasional wins, such as the narrow victory over Coastal Carolina, do little to bolster their overall standing. With upcoming games against opponents like Arkansas Pine Bluff and Mississippi Valley State, the team has a chance to improve its position, but the low winning probabilities suggest they may only secure a spot in the NCAA tournament through automatic qualification, likely necessitating a strong performance in their conference tournament.
Date | Opponent | Ranking | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
11/16 | @Tennessee St | 319 | L81-71 |
11/19 | @Georgia | 25 | L93-45 |
11/22 | S Carolina St | 228 | L82-70 |
11/23 | Coastal Car | 261 | W77-70 |
11/25 | IUPUI | 334 | L88-83 |
11/30 | Lipscomb | 88 | L82-44 |
12/15 | @Chattanooga | 223 | L85-63 |
12/18 | @UAB | 203 | L96-67 |
12/21 | Samford | 95 | 30% |
12/28 | @Georgia Tech | 138 | 27% |
1/4 | Ark Pine Bluff | 363 | 58% |
1/6 | MS Valley St | 364 | 59% |
1/11 | @Alcorn St | 345 | 40% |
1/13 | @Jackson St | 291 | 35% |
1/18 | Alabama St | 280 | 41% |
1/25 | TX Southern | 325 | 45% |
1/27 | Prairie View | 343 | 47% |
2/1 | @Florida A&M | 346 | 40% |
2/3 | @Bethune-Cookman | 246 | 32% |
2/8 | Southern Univ | 163 | 35% |
2/10 | Grambling | 298 | 43% |
2/15 | @MS Valley St | 364 | 52% |
2/17 | @Ark Pine Bluff | 363 | 50% |
2/22 | Bethune-Cookman | 246 | 40% |
2/24 | Florida A&M | 346 | 48% |
3/1 | @Alabama St | 280 | 34% |
3/6 | @Grambling | 298 | 35% |
3/8 | @Southern Univ | 163 | 28% |